Post by habibi on Sept 16, 2023 3:39:43 GMT -3
The content of the article
Effect of the reform for the state
I believe that all such decisions and edits instill distrust and anxiety in people rather than motivation and enthusiasm. Most likely, the people who pass these laws banning the dismissal of workers of pre-retirement age do not communicate very well with business.
We have enough “dens” in terms of work, and on top of all this, pension and pre-retirement innovations are constantly appearing. I think there are plenty of problems, why create new ones? If an employee Phone Number List works decently, then no matter what age he is, the company will not refuse him, but if he is useless, then he will be like that at eighteen, and at twenty, and at twenty-five, and he cannot avoid being fired. Here you need to proceed from his professional qualities, whether he is a qualified specialist or not. There should be no dismissal without an objective reason related to the quality of the employee’s work.
It seems to me that the transition to pension reform will not be very abrupt, perhaps it will take about five or ten years. Society needs time to adapt, especially those people who have very little time left before retirement. A certain percentage of the population reacted extremely negatively to the innovation, the level of trust in the government decreased, and this is quite understandable. In this regard, the state began to actively revive opinions and make amendments, focused more on the human factor.
Pros and cons of the law for employers and employees
If you consider this law carefully, you can identify positive and negative aspects for both employers and employees. We can say that the state has more advantages than the individual. Thus, the advantages of the reform for pensioners include increasing the level and quality of life, maintaining working capacity, increasing personnel potential, based on this - an increase in pensions, in an insignificant amount, but still. The advantages will include a move away from discrimination, since the market needs qualified personnel, and if the employer understands this, then it will invest more in the employee even before his retirement.
Effect of the reform for the state
I believe that all such decisions and edits instill distrust and anxiety in people rather than motivation and enthusiasm. Most likely, the people who pass these laws banning the dismissal of workers of pre-retirement age do not communicate very well with business.
We have enough “dens” in terms of work, and on top of all this, pension and pre-retirement innovations are constantly appearing. I think there are plenty of problems, why create new ones? If an employee Phone Number List works decently, then no matter what age he is, the company will not refuse him, but if he is useless, then he will be like that at eighteen, and at twenty, and at twenty-five, and he cannot avoid being fired. Here you need to proceed from his professional qualities, whether he is a qualified specialist or not. There should be no dismissal without an objective reason related to the quality of the employee’s work.
It seems to me that the transition to pension reform will not be very abrupt, perhaps it will take about five or ten years. Society needs time to adapt, especially those people who have very little time left before retirement. A certain percentage of the population reacted extremely negatively to the innovation, the level of trust in the government decreased, and this is quite understandable. In this regard, the state began to actively revive opinions and make amendments, focused more on the human factor.
Pros and cons of the law for employers and employees
If you consider this law carefully, you can identify positive and negative aspects for both employers and employees. We can say that the state has more advantages than the individual. Thus, the advantages of the reform for pensioners include increasing the level and quality of life, maintaining working capacity, increasing personnel potential, based on this - an increase in pensions, in an insignificant amount, but still. The advantages will include a move away from discrimination, since the market needs qualified personnel, and if the employer understands this, then it will invest more in the employee even before his retirement.